|
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| Is the Intercepter better for an average joe rider than the super hawk?
Jamie ~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| I think you will find the Interceptor to be plenty fast enough for the real world. It handles really well and has a more comfortable riding position. Just named CycleWorlds 2002 Open-Class Streetbike of the year! Just my feelings...
Matt |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| | I rode a superhawk and didn't like it. And its ridiculously priced for the bike that it is... I have a cbr600 and love it. The interceptor is supposed to be an awesome bike...definitely a better bike than a "super" hawk. I may get one for my next bike. |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| | |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| I also tried the Superhawk bofore I decided on a VFR. The Superhawk was very uncomfortable for me, but the VFR...well, I can turn easy 600 to 700 mile days on the VFR.
The 2002 VFR that I now own is my third VFR. I had a '96, a '00 , and now a '02.
I love 'em!!
Dave |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| I think it is a better allrounder, but also alot more expensive. They sell Superhawks pretty cheap.
BRIAN |
| |
|
|