|
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| | I have an 02 blaster 200 and was thinking about trading for a 300ex i am just wondering which one is faster stock? |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| | The top speed stock of the 300ex is 54 and the top speed of a blaster stock is 59. |
| |
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/5/2007 10:44:31 AM
Posts: -1,167, Visits: 2 |
| well the blaster will beat it off take off, but iam not sure if the 300ex will catch u
Tommy Whittern |
| |
| | | Junior Member
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/6/2008 12:57:09 PM
Posts: 23, Visits: 32 |
| | definately keep the blaster. the 200 blaster stock can tear up the 300ex in race.. the 2 stroke just wins overall. |
| |
| | | Forum Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 4/29/2007 2:49:20 PM
Posts: 6, Visits: 4 |
| | Blaster all the way!!!!!!!!! Put it this way, 2-stroke=Fast racing and 4-stroke= leasure trail riding. |
| |
| | | Forum Guru
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/25/2007 5:18:43 PM
Posts: 69, Visits: 39 |
| blasters suck *** ! air cooled thats bad aspesholy for a 2 stroke
|
| |
| | | Forum Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/18/2007 11:05:34 PM
Posts: 47, Visits: 20 |
| | well blasters dont suck, theyre pretty good for an aircooled 2stroke 200 they are better than any banshee ever was on the track. you can get water jacket top ends for them, they call them ice cubes but they cost a pretty penny and they dont come in std sizes neither so if u get oe, its gonna cost you more |
| |
|
|